Issue #22.30 :: 07/29/2009 - 08/04/2009
We Want You … to Stay in Columbia

Local Team Targets Attraction, Retention of Young Workers

BY DAN COOK

It’s a common dilemma among young adults in Columbia: Should I stay or should I go?

To many 20-somethings pondering their life’s first fully independent venture, the idea of staying in Columbia seems unpalatable: Cities like Austin and Portland seem so much more exciting, while Charlotte and Atlanta seem to offer so many more opportunities. Then there’s ultra-hip Asheville, with its beautiful mountain setting and tons of cool, locally owned businesses. And don’t forget about Charleston and its alluring beaches.

In comparison, what does Columbia have to offer?

Katherine Robinson, EngenuitySC

More than you might give it credit for, actually. The city has world-class recreational options in its three rivers and the Congaree National Park; a vibrant and diverse arts scene that excels in independent film, classical music, theater, dance and the visual arts; a flagship university along with a wide array of other higher education options; a talented and broad-based local music community; an ever-expanding dining scene; and much more.

Sure, there are problems, too: limited job offerings, a high crime rate, borderline-dysfunctional local government and a relatively small supply of top-notch touring musicians coming to town.

But every time one of those 20-somethings decides that the pluses outweigh the minuses — that Columbia is the place to be — it’s a choice that matters not only to that particular individual, but also to the broader community, especially when that individual is a college graduate with a life of high earnings potential ahead of them. If they stay, they might start a successful business, volunteer with a social service organization or eventually serve on the board of a local nonprofit. If they leave — and nearly half of local 18-to-25-year olds say they plan to — all those potential contributions to the community are lost.

Addressing this lost potential — this exodus of college graduates from Columbia — is the challenge of the Columbia Talent Magnet Team. The team is a collaborative effort among EngenuitySC, which supports the development of a knowledge-based economy; COR (Columbia Opportunity Resource), a young professionals group; the Columbia Metropolitan Convention & Visitors Bureau, which markets Columbia to convention planners and tourists; New Carolina, which promotes South Carolina’s economic competitiveness; the Greater Columbia Chamber of Commerce, which promotes pro-business policies; and the Southern Growth Policies Board, a North Carolina-based think tank that promotes collaboration among government, business and academic leaders.

Last fall, the Magnet Team conducted a survey and held a forum on the challenge of attracting and retaining young workers. Out of those efforts has come the Columbia Talent Magnet Report, which lays out the challenge facing the city and offers recommendations on how to get there. The report, “A Road Map to a Talent-Powered Economy,” can be found at columbiatalent.com.

Free Times sat down recently with several Magnet Team members and discussed the issue. The following are edited excerpts of that discussion.

Free Times: Tell me about the team that is assembled here, and tell me why your organization has an interest in this issue.

Greg Hilton, EngenuitySC

Greg Hilton: I work with a group called EngenuitySC. We are the regional knowledge-economy leadership group here, tasked with transitioning Columbia from traditional economic opportunity to what we would consider the knowledge-based economy. So, we are the de facto project managers, collaboration managers, of this project. We’re involved because talent attraction and retention is one of the key elements in growing a knowledge economy. That’s why we launched it and why we’re involved in it.

Mandi Engram: I’m with the Convention and Visitors Bureau and our job is to promote Columbia as a destination for visitors and for meetings to come to Columbia. We don’t market inside the state of South Carolina, but it is important for people to have pride in their community and for people to know what’s going on, because there are so many good things that are happening in this community that people just aren’t aware of, especially the university students. So I think it’s important for us to carry that message.

FT: If you are primarily focused on bringing conventions and visitors here, what is the connection between that and building the knowledge economy here?

ME: Well, it’s not just specifically building the knowledge economy; it’s building community pride. I think one of our biggest challenges is the perception that locals have of our community because they’re not aware of all the good things, all the different attractions, things we have to experience here — the arts, the culture, the rivers.

GH: Not to mention that all the things that make a city a cool place to live and learn and work and play are the same thing that attract businesses, that attract events.

ME: All the conventions that we’ve been able to land like the National Hydrogen Association; it all started with local people in the community that have been those ambassadors, that have helped us bring in those events.

FT: OK, so that’s the connection; that you make people excited about their own community and then in their own business lives, they become potential ambassadors …

ME: To spread the message to other people.

Katherine Swartz, COR

Katherine Swartz: I’m the board chair for COR, Columbia Opportunity Resource. Columbia Opportunity Resource is, we think, the Midlands’ leading young and emerging professionals organization, and what we bring to the table is the connection with young leaders and also students.
The only thing I would add is that, though non-scientific [because it was a self-selected sample], one of the things that came out of the survey was that the perception of Columbia and Midlands-area residents of their area is lower than people who have moved here or people who are visiting the area. So we have a big challenge to [try to] improve that.

Katherine Robinson:
I’m Katherine Robinson with EngenuitySC, helping with the entrepreneurship piece and management of the project.

FT: If you look at it on a very surface level, South Carolina has an influx of people, and Richland County has a greater influx of people than the state as a whole. Richland County has a higher level of bachelor’s degrees than the national average. So if you look at that baseline, you might say, “We’re doing OK, so what’s the problem?”

GH: You really can’t have enough of the right assets to improve the region. So, we’re doing good in these categories, or well, but there’s a difference between doing good and doing great. Sometimes good is the enemy of great.
One of the issues we are facing is, yes, we have an influx of population. But if you dig into those numbers, that influx is anchored slightly to the older demographic. We have 8,000 students that graduate from higher education institutions here every year, and while we do keep a good number of those there are also a lot that leave. And they go to places that have a perception of having more opportunities than Columbia, places like Charlotte and Atlanta, maybe even in some cases places like Greenville and Charleston. I think that’s one of the key issues facing our region.

KS: To counter that, I would say for us it isn’t just Richland County and it isn’t just Columbia, it’s also Lexington County, Newberry County, Kershaw County. So when you combine all those and you average out statistics, it’s probably skewed not in our favor — it’s not a good statistic, it’s one where we can definitely improve things.

GH: If you go broader and you look at [population growth in] South Carolina and you look at the breakdown of those who were 35 to 60, the growth was much higher. The growth or lack thereof in the 20 to 35 age group was .5 percent. So you’ve got to look at the overall comparison: We’re strong, but we could be a lot stronger.
If you think about someone who’s 25 who moves to Columbia or to the Midlands, who has a great background and great education: They are at the beginning of their earning potential, and if we can retain them in the community, that person grows into someone who really becomes a one-person economic engine. That’s kind of the concept behind it.
And we know there’s a strong relationship between the number of people holding higher education degrees [in a community] and per capita income.

FT: And that’s one of the numbers that you all know we’re not doing so well on, not statewide, not city-wide.

GH: Yeah, not so much.

FT: Let’s talk about some of the assets Columbia has, the best features that Columbia has to get people to stay here.

Mandi Engram, Columbia Metropolitan Convention & Visitors Bureau

ME: There are so many things to choose from. You’ve got the Museum of Art right across the street. They just had a huge international exhibition; we were the first city to get Turner to Cézanne. You’ve got the State Museum; they’re getting a planetarium and a 4-D theater. You’ve got the Nickelodeon moving into the old Fox Theater on Main Street. You’ve got the [Congaree] River that they’re developing. You’ve got EdVenture Children’s Museum. We’ve got a national park here. There are so many things to do outdoors. All these things that have happened in the last 10 or 15 years, there are a lot of things that people who were born and raised here really haven’t gone out and experienced.

KR: I think you also have to point out that Columbia not only has entertainment, recreational and cultural assets, but also the flagship university.

GH: The university has tremendous economic impact. It’s an engine now and an engine of the future, [and] with that constant influx of all these people of different backgrounds — all these students, talent, youth — it’s really important.
If you look at Columbia versus Greenville, it’s a stark difference. They may have prettier buildings or perhaps there is more focus on investment in the downtown region, but people in Greenville will say upfront that they lack the diversity that a strong higher education system brings into a community. I think it’s one of our strongest assets. It’s pervasive.

KS: I’ll add something intangible, which is just the culture of the city: It’s this welcoming, warm environment — different from other cities even in the South, definitely different from larger cities like Charlotte or Atlanta where there’s just not that warm, friendly feeling.

ME: One of the things I hear the most from people that come here is that it is a change of pace: It’s relaxing to be here, and people are so welcoming. They’ve been to other cities in the South, but there is just something different about Columbia.

FT: I think the point you made about the cultural environment being welcoming — I hear that over and over again. One of the [other] things that I like about Columbia is that you can make an impact here as an individual that you could not fathom making in Charlotte or Atlanta.

GH: It’s intangible, but it has an impact and you see it everywhere. And that’s one of the challenges: How do you communicate that feature of what we have as a community to people who may not be familiar with it?

FT: What is priority number one in this effort to attract and retain?

KR: I think it’s just improving the perception of Columbia internally and externally. A lot of people kind of have this perception of Columbia, and when they get here and look around [it changes]. Or if they already live here and they don’t really look into what’s going on, they don’t realize that we have all the assets we have.

GH: I’m going to quote one of our survey respondents, and this pretty much sums it up: Do something. Do anything. That is the priority, to create action out of what we’ve learned.

FT: In some ways, it’s such a chicken-and-egg question. Because if you successfully change the perception, then you have a cadre of young people who want to stay here. But if the jobs aren’t here then they’re forced to leave anyway.

GH: It’s not going to happen overnight. So we’re not going to check the email at columbiatalent.com and have 10,000 messages, “Hey, I just arrived in Columbia and I want to get connected, where are the jobs?” The reality is that people will go where they can find opportunity, regardless of what that means.

So, I think the strategy is threefold: First and foremost, if we can’t recruit jobs here, let’s create them ourselves. Let’s focus on entrepreneurship, not just on the commercial side but also in the way our community thinks about entrepreneurship. Two: We do have a fairly robust economy here. Per capita income may not be the highest, but we’ve got some great industries and business opportunities, and we’ve got to do something to step up the engagement in connecting young people into those companies. And the third thing is we need to focus on some industries where Columbia and the region can be world class.

ME: You’ve got to start somewhere. You’ve got to get people in here and get the message out to people about all the great things we have going on, like the hydrogen conference. Bringing people in can potentially spawn new projects and new companies that will lead to high-tech jobs.

FT: I think there’s kind of a disconnect. It’s easy look at this as an economic development question and say, “OK, this needs to be done.” But when you try to put yourself into the mindset of a 22-year-old: They don’t care about economic development; they care about what the nightlife is like. They want to know why our downtown isn’t as happening as Greenville’s. Part of it is the physical layout of the city: [Greenville] has everything laid out on one street; we have the Vista, we have Five Points, we have Main Street, and they’re not connected.

ME: I think that is one of our assets: We’ve got something for everyone. Each one of our districts caters to a different market. While they are not all in central location, it caters to a wider audience.

GH: I think it’s definitely a challenge though. When you have one thing to focus on, it’s very easy to make a decision: Put it all there. But here in Columbia, City Council or whoever, when they talk about where they want to spend their dollars, where they want to support development, it’s a much more challenging situation because you have all these different areas. So I think one of the challenges is that we have a set resource base divided among a lot of different programs. But if we can just always think about what the next opportunity is, then I think long term we’ve got better opportunities than those places that only have a couple of things that they’re focused on.

KS: From the COR membership perspective though, I hear them talk about what can I do to get involved, what can I do to get connected to the community. So, I would say, yes, it’s what am I going to be able to do on Thursday or Friday night, but it’s also that these leaders who are pushing 701 or the Nickelodeon forward, they have an army of volunteers behind them. I like to think that it’s not just about your paycheck and what you’re going to do on Friday night, but also about what you can do to make a difference.

FT: There is a lot of change, a lot of forward-thinking projects. But you also have these festering long-term things, where our readers [ask], “Why do bands go to Charlotte?” It’s been a perpetual question that I’ve been confronted with for the last 20 years: Why can’t Columbia do better on that front?

GH: That’s one of many issues. It would be great to have more live music activity here. Not to say that it’s terrible, but we can always do better.

KS: One of the issues that we’ve talked about from an entrepreneurial standpoint is that Columbia needs to do a lot better job of fostering artists — giving them a home, supporting them financially, providing the resources for them to be able to connect with each other, all those sorts of things. That’s part of our effort behind the scenes, to facilitate some of that.

FT: I think it’s really important that those kinds of issues be on the radar on the economic development front — that some people are making their life decisions based on what’s going on in the arts and what the opportunities are here.

GH: And I would just say again, speaking to our internal perceptions, that we need to do a better job of making it easy for people to find what’s going on and get connected to those things. There’s a program going on right now that just started last Monday called the Artists as Entrepreneurs Institute that Midlands Tech and Engenuity are partnering with the South Carolina Arts Commission on. You know, there are two or three musicians in there, there’s a poet, there’s a sculptor, and they’re learning how they can explore the art of the possible with their creative works, with creating a business from their passion.

FT: Well, Natalie Brown — she does the Alternacirque at Art Bar — she’s going to that. She is exactly the kind of person we are talking about: Just one person with a lot of commitment. And while we’re talking about the Arts Commission, I’ll give a shout out to their New Audience Road Show.

KR: I’m actually an [alumnus]. I was in it the first year, and now the Arts Commission has given it over to the alumni to run, so I am part of that effort. I think the arts and cultural community in Columbia is growing stronger every year. Programs like the New Audience Road Show, those arts organizations [involved] have really seen the benefit of introducing new people to their performances.

FT: I don’t think you can say enough [about the Road Show]. Even if there’s only maybe 30 people in the program each year, 30 people plus their friends can make an enormous difference for an arts organization, especially when those people tend to get involved in leadership positions after they’ve been there. Plus, it changes their entire perception of the community and what’s going on in the community.

KS: And comparatively, if you look at theater ticket prices in Atlanta, I’ve lived there, and here it’s a whole lot easier to attend more shows and different events with the different theaters and venues than it is in some of the cities where we are comparing ourselves.

FT: Since we’re on the topic of connecting people to the community, I thought that was a very important part of your report. Particularly the internship idea, the direct connections with companies, because whether it’s the arts or anything else, I think sometimes it’s hard to wrap our brains around what your mentality is when you’re in college. Your world is so small: It’s going to class, going to Five Points, going to the Vista.

GH: Maybe you step off campus for a coffee.

ME: I think it’s important to develop something with the University 101 classes to help promote how many things there are to do. Because you’re right, some students never venture out [beyond campus] other than to go to the mall or go to Starbucks. I feel like it’s our job to get into the classrooms and spread that message.

GH: Mandi is alluding to one program that we would like to see get off the ground, which is a “Welcome to Columbia” introduction to incoming freshmen or graduate students or whoever. We’ve started some of that. We’re working with the Moore School, the graduate program there, to help craft a better welcome agenda when these students come into town to get them involved with some service learning projects through COR, to get them involved with networking opportunities with the Chamber, to get past that thin film of plastic between the campus and the community.

[To Grant Jackson of the Greater Columbia Chamber of Commerce, just arriving]: Grant, do you want to speak to this internship program that we’re looking to do?

Grant Jackson, Greater Columbia Chamber of Commerce

Grant Jackson: Well, the internship program and internships in general are critical both from the business community standpoint, because that’s a way business can connect with good talent, [and] on the other end because students that intern with companies become a lot more likely to stay in that community. They may grow and become the next generation of leadership in the community. They also may become the next generation of entrepreneurs in the community.

FT: So how does this talent group go about formalizing that process of encouraging local businesses to have more internship programs?

GH: The big picture is this: We’d like to see one fully integrated regional internship program under one banner, one brand. All universities, all the students, all the businesses, all the entrepreneurs plugging into it. A clearinghouse focused on the Midlands. That’s probably a couple of years off, because it’s a challenging and fragmented system that we have now. Each college and university has its own program, even each department has its own program, and it’s not connected into others. So what we’re working on is, let’s identify what the right model is first, let’s pilot something that we think might work, then if it works let’s roll it out on a large scale.

Through the Talent Magnet Project, the Chamber is going to be working with the USC Honors College on a pilot program to help raise the banner for the value of internships. Getting companies committed to this, creating programs and then connecting directly to the Honors College.

Actually, I don’t know if we’re supposed to be talking about this yet, now that I mention it. This is not official. It’s a pilot program.

GJ: The way it usually works is the way it worked with me when I started my newspaper career back in the dark ages. I was taking a journalism course and one of my adjunct professors was the city editor at the local paper. He came to me after class one day and said, “Would you like to intern?” Normally that’s how it works. There’s not a place to go if you don’t have a good connection. And that’s what we’re looking at with this pilot project: that connectivity, that bridge between supply and demand, basically.

ME: It’s just a daunting process. It just takes forever.

GH: I think that’s an overall theme for the entire project: Eliminate obstacles. I think that’s what we’re doing is eliminating obstacles — to people coming here, to students getting jobs, to people starting companies, to people connecting to the community. Get the obstacles out of the way and they’ll have no excuses — they’ll have to stay.

KS: And those types of students seeking internships are exactly the type of people we want to keep in Columbia, because they are aggressive and career-focused in whatever kind of career it is. And those are the people that are probably going to have the most economic impact and have the most civic impact, because those are people that are looking to get involved — they are “yes” people, go-getter types.

KR: I think you can intertwine internships and perception, because I think one of the powerful elements of internships from a student perspective is that they can discover areas and career paths that they didn’t know existed. And if they can explore many different facets of business in Columbia, that will only improve their perception of Columbia in general.

FT: Back on perception: All of us live here and we all have a pretty multifaceted understanding of where we live, but to outsiders — well, the only three things [they might know] about South Carolina are that, number one, we have a Confederate Flag flying on our State House grounds; number two, we have a state amendment against gay marriage; and number three, our governor had an affair. So how do you let them know that there is another Columbia than what they might have seen on the news?

KS: I don’t know that it’s so much our words, but it’s about giving them an opportunity to be here and experience it. Maybe it’s less our words and more of our hand holding: Let me show you what there is to do here and let you experience the way of life and meet the people. We probably can’t do it through the media, trying to combat that message, but what we can do is be good ambassadors for our city and teach others how to be good ambassadors as well.

GH: Amen.

ME: And I think that people locally are more in tune to those negative messages than outsiders are. Very rarely have I had someone visiting from outside Columbia bring those things up — occasionally jokingly, if something big is going on — but for the most part we don’t hear about it.

FT: With such an ambitious and multifaceted agenda — from perceptions to actually attracting business — how can you communicate a message clearly and effectively and keep it on the radar?

KR: We’re going to spend the next year going to different groups presenting the report and talking about the issue, and I think from that hopefully some of those people will go out and tell other people and it will create, as we say in the report, the launching of 1,000 initiatives that will be self-sustaining.

ME: And as far as branding the community and getting that message out there, Grant and I have been involved with several different stakeholder meetings bringing realtors together and all these local ad agencies together, people who are out there putting messages out about Columbia.

GH: The good news is that having a great place to live, learn, work and play is good — you can pretty much sell that message to anybody. But we also have some programs that we’re looking at rolling out to keep the momentum. We’re going to be doing another forum in the fall or early spring to continue to address these issues. And so we have two or three things that we are planning collectively and doing as a group that we are taking ownership of. And then we have another list of specific recommendations that we are going to put out there and say, “We need partners to get these things done.”

FT: It seems that a lot of it comes down to what Katherine [Swartz] said about giving the individual a good experience. One person goes through an internship or the New Audience Road Show and all of a sudden you’ve taken that one talented, intelligent person and sort of flipped on a light bulb about what their opportunities might be here.

KS: Yes, sort of a small-wins mindset. A lot of the projects we are thinking about here are huge, but if we just think about one step at a time, one person at a time, if we can change their perception or at least get them thinking about changing their perception. If we can just do that with 20 people, that’s a win because that’s 20 people who are going to tell 20 or 30 others and it will have the viral effect. 

Let us know what you think: Email editor@free-times.com.

 
Comments
Don't forget that one of the principal reasons young people who are native to any city--not just Columbia--leave when they are ready to "go out on their own" is their belief that in order to "make it alone," they need to get away from parents and other family. Many of them actually plan to return "home" one day, although we all know how often that doesn't work out once one is away and involved first in job and perhaps eventually in marriage and family of one's own. So young people don't always leave because there isn't attractive vocational or professional employment near home; there are other, more personal reasons.
Eduardo ArbustoJuly 29th 04:14pm
If the Three River parkway is one of your main draws to keep young adults... then there is no need for any further discussion for this article. It comes down to good jobs, low crime, affordable housing, supporting the arts and a favorable attitude about the city. Period. Columbia is lacking and this panel can't help because they don't have the power of the pen. Local gov. needs to be revamped.
ghrJuly 29th 06:32pm
"Excels in independent film?!?" We have ONE hole-in-the-wall arthouse theater. And even that's probably going to get shut down the first time they try to show a controversial film after they take that new public funding. Austin we're not.
Armand NolloyJuly 30th 02:52pm
this is the first quote in the story...."We are the regional knowledge-economy leadership group here, tasked with transitioning Columbia from traditional economic opportunity to what we would consider the knowledge-based economy." This jargon spouted thinks he's gonna make Columbia more appealing. Sounds like he's simply figures out a way to make a living by taking common sense and cloaking it is BS.
jdayJuly 30th 06:51pm
Columbia was the first city in SC to pass a Gay Rights ordinance. SC isn't gay friendly, but Cola is. If you want to make a difference, you can't beat Columbia. I've also lived in Chicago and Portland, Maine (which is half Cola's size), and I was never able to make any kind of impact like I have in Columbia...and I *did* return to Columbia.... And the city government isn't "borderline dysfunctional." Trash gets picked up, fires put out, police dispatched.... It's that kind of talking Cola down that causes the problem. In Chicago under Jane Byrne, trash didn't get picked up, streets didn't get snow-plowed, etc.
KBFennerJuly 30th 06:57pm
While I'm ranting here - has anyone involved in anything interesting in Columbia ever met the people on the panel for this story? I don't recall seeing them at the Columbia Museum, 701 Contemporary Art Center, the Hunter Gatherer, the S.C. Phil, Southern Exposure, Trustus.....
jdayJuly 30th 07:39pm
and if you can't find something to do, you aren't looking. Of course we don't have the top POP and ROCK touring acts (classical, folk, jazz and other genres do show up, as well as Impressionists and Broadway touring companies, but hey...) We do have some pretty top rate entertainment for a city our size....and there aren't a lot of places so close to both beach and mountains not to mention that we also have great access to natural rivers and creeks, a National Park, etc. and I can be pretty much assured of running into someone I know if I want to, and I'm not even all that social. You can easily be where everybody knows your name.
KBFennerJuly 30th 06:59pm
Jeffrey, I think you're being pretty hard on the panel. Greg is an economic development guy, so he uses business lingo ... what's wrong with that? Arts people use arts lingo, business people use business lingo. And no, the panel wasn't comprised of arts people. I don't think that diminishes their dedication to the mission, and it doesn't mean that arts isn't on their radar. Greg obviously recognized that it was important and worthwhile for Engenuity to get involved with artistic entrepreneur training ... that's surely worth something, even if you don't seem him at 701 openings.
DanJuly 30th 08:34pm
This wouldn't be so sad if this wasn't the same exact conversation we were having 15 years ago... and Columbia was a lot cooler then. We need another Holderman (sarcasm).
DVerdeJuly 31st 09:36pm
Seems like a group of people figured out how to get themselves paid while giving the rest of us a pep talk about how things could be better if only....
StarfinchJuly 31st 12:31pm
Dan... you are probably right that I am being too hard on the panel. I'm sure their intentions are good, but I just don't understand how people who don't seem very involved in the community are suddenly in charge of it. Part of this comes from my frustration with current city leaders (including some in the arts) who I have never seen at a concert, play or art show.
jdayJuly 31st 12:32pm
Akhenaton has identified what, in my mind, is the key to understanding the problem, although perhaps I take a slightly different view of it. The problem is perception, and that is more complex than can be explained away by the jobs and the confederate flag issues. I once had a friend who moved to Hawaii with her husband because he had been transferred there by his employer. Now, I have never been to a more pleasant, beautiful. and climatically desirable location in my life, where the natives are just falling over themselves friendly, and so on, but I regularly received letters from her in which she berated the place. She said once that she would give anything to get back to Kansas, that living in Hawaii was like being in a prison. Obviously she wasn't really talking about Hawaii; she was talking about herself and her perception of her life situation. When people express their feelings about living in a particular location, they say far more about themselves than they do about the supposed subject of their assessment. It would be interesting to see an objective "inventory" of what Columbia and the immediately surrounding area has to offer its citizen or potential citizens. Indeed, that's exactly the sort of thing the economic development panel might produce, among other things, and it would be interesting, further, to be able to look at that next to inventories of comparably sized cities around the country. I believe locals might be surprised at how their city stacks up. Pretty damned well, I predict. But Akhenaton is correct, as I said at the outset: It's a matter of perception. We can have amazing weather, vocational opportunities, entertainment, educational opportunities, health care facilities, natural wonders, and so on, but if people's perceptions are negative it will all be for naught. One of the reasons California was and is so popular, aside from the work opportunities, was its widely recognized attitude of acceptance of everyone, any nationality, any sexual preference, any race, any politics, and so on. That provided great grist for the comedic mill over the years, but the people came in droves; in fact, some think that it was to its detriment it was so attractive. Now I lived for a few years in California, and I didn't find the people any more accepting than they had been anywhere else I had lived. In fact, being an "outsider" in those days was perhaps worse there than anywhere else I had lived. You don't hear about that, though. The point is, though, that people, generally, have an impression about California whether it's deserved or not, and South Carolina has a reputation, deserved or not, as well. People's perceptions of the place may not be accurate, but they are real and have to be dealt with. People who live here have their perceptions as well, not just of South Carolina but of Columbia in particular, whether they represent the facts or not. Our education system does need a major overhaul, but so do the systems of many,many other places around the country. Comparing standardized test scores does not present an accurate picture, and someone who truly understands that issue needs to get busy explaining that to the rest of the world. Columbia is, indeed, close to the buckle of the Bible Belt, and that is nowhere more apparent in its reputation for treating people with other ideas with less than open arms. Columbia, however, is far more tolerant than most of the rest of the state. And so on. I have already rambled on far too long. Quit whining, Columbians, and get busy letting the rest of the world know what a great place we think this is to learn, work, play, and live.
Eduardo ArbustoJuly 31st 10:14am
You want to know Columbia's biggest issue/challenge/problem? It's located in the state of South Carolina. There are simply perception issues attached to the state of South Carolina that cannot be overcome by Columbia, maybe even moreso since it is the state capital. No where is this more evident than with the Confederate flag flying on the state capitol grounds. And the basis for Columbia becoming a talent magnet or whatever you want to call it is JOBS, plain and simple--specifically, high-paying jobs. And an abundance of high-paying jobs is linked to education. South Carolina doesn't invest in its universities like, say, its neighbor to the north does. Even primary and secondary education lacks proper investment, especially since South Carolina is well-known to rank at the bottom of the barrel when it comes to education (there's the perception issue again). If ever progressive leadership were to be seen in the Legislature, specifically in certain key positions, then you'd see real progress in South Carolina and Columbia. Until then, old battles will continue to be fought and state leaders will continue to be reactive rather than proactive and Georgia and North Carolina will continue to run all kinds of circles around it.
Akhenaton06July 31st 12:07am
I couldn't help but laugh at the quote,"one of the things that came out of the survey was that the perception of Columbia and Midlands-area residents of their area is lower than people who have moved here or people who are visiting the area". Exactly. The more you know, the less you like. If the board members are not all indigenous Columbians, they cannot POSSIBLY empathize with our city's situation and thereby are powerless to change it.
I. Ronald EaseAugust 2nd 02:43pm
Greg is a complete Dick.
JohnAugust 2nd 06:57pm
There are no good jobs here, that's why people leave.
JoeAugust 2nd 09:53pm
If Columbia truly wants to start attracting young people, it may be best to set their sites on being the best in SC. How do we rate compared to Charleston and Greenville? Recreation:Columbia does have a national park. And two large state forests that are great for hiking/picknicking. but they would not draw you to the area, are more fun to use because they are close. Greenville has multiple parks that are connected making for pleasant long hikes. Charleston has several good parks, as well as tremendous dog parks for people with canines to congregate in. Charleston has the beach, which outranks lake Murray as well as Lake Hartwell. Frankly rivers with "don't drink the water" advisories aren't very attractive-even if the parks along such are nice. Charleston wins. Jobs: Unless you are in state government there is minimal oppurtunity here along with lower wages than the upstate. Wages and oppurtunities in Charleston aren't great either. Greenville has leveraged it's 100 some miles of interstate between two big cities into a good manufacturing base. Cost of living: Rents are higher here than the upstate, similar to Charleston. Surprising to me is the cost of eating out, which is about ten dollars a meal (for two) higher than Greenville for similar meals. With the lower wages, the win here is for Greenville as well. Crime: There seems to be too many parts of the city that would be desirable to live in apart from the crime rates. We need to clean up this city. Charleston has these areas as well, but no. charleston is easy to avoid. Greenville keeps it quiet. Nightlife: There are good places with people that are similar to you in all three cities. Universities: Never have I heard someone in Greenville decry the lack of diveristy that a big university would bring. There are equal amounts of odd people in each town. (Some of my friends) And lets face it, all three are still highly right leaning towns that favor comformity. (nothing wrong with that) There is also enough access in all three towns for post grad learning. So there may be good things about Columbia, but it lives in the shadows of the two other major cities in SC. It even mentions them in its "short drive to the mountains or the beach" theme. Columbia is a great place to raise kids. Our schools may be bad for the midlevel students, but there are at least two districts that do a great job for the acheiver. This is not as true for Greenville or Charleston. We should expand on this strength, and can get to the point that even the less desirable locations are considered safe to live for single females (a good stand-would I let my daughter live there?). It may be cool to attempt to attract single twentysomethings, but I think it would better serve our community to go after young families. But nothing will happen without a broader employment base.
EricAugust 3rd 04:33am
The problem is, while Columbia IS getting better about being *somewhat* of a 'cool' place to live, it's just not happening fast enough for the young crowd. Just yesterday, a friend of mine who's a senior at a school here in Colatown told me she's basically counting down the days when she can get the hell out of here and go to California. She's SO disappointed with the music scene here, and that's what she's going into as a career - advertising and marketing of bands, etc. As for me and my husband, right now we're staying here basically because 1) the cost of living is cheap as hell here 2) in this market there's no way we could sell our house 3) we both have good jobs so yeahe, we're hanging onto that! But we recently came back from a trip to Montreal, QC, Canada and I gotta tell ya' - every time I travel to a place like that and have to come home to a place like this???? It's just damn depressing... :( Our public transportation system sucks, we are so NOT a green city...ugh, don't get me started!
SarahAugust 3rd 11:48am
FT recently held a similar forum on the state of the arts, with perhaps a more broadly based panel of influential people in the field. While this panel discussion could have been weightier if city or county elected officials had been present, the average age of this group is noteworthy. When young business leaders show interest in making downtown Columbia a more desirable place live, work and thrive, rather than simply a place to work during the day, I'm hopeful that it's a positive sign for the future of downtown arts and entertainment.
JDSharpeAugust 3rd 07:57am
Sarah, I think you make an excellent point about the pace of change. I love Columbia, I am fully committed to being here and I have seen a lot of changes in the 20-plus years I have lived here, particularly vast improvements in the dining scene and the rise of the Vista. But you are right: Things move very slowly, and things you would like to see happen in 2-3 years often take 10, or don't happen at all. (Example: I've been hearing for a decade or so about the need for a mid-sized arts venue ... where is it?) On the other hand, one of the points that came out of the discussion was how much one individual can create change on their own in this town. It is truly astounding: Richard Burts and the renovation of 701 Whaley; Andy Smith and the Indie Grits festival; Natalie Brown and Alternacirque; the Columbia Quad Squad; Kevin Varner and Hunter-Gatherer; the restaurateurs behind Gervais & Vine, Solstice, Mr. Friendly's, etc.; Michelle Wang and the Miyo's empire, etc. In each of these cases (and plenty of others not mentioned), you're talking about one individual or a small group that made a commitment to Columbia and has had a huge and positive impact on our cultural life. Who knows what other contributions might be forthcoming? Of course there are many things that I (and many others) would like to see change, and faster. But sometimes the only way to effect change is to be the change yourself.
DanAugust 3rd 01:11pm
As one of the members to the Talent Team, I'd like to address a few points on behalf of the organization I represent, Columbia Opportunity Resource (COR) a non-profit, volunteer-driven organization (i.e. no paid staff - learn more at http://www.ourcor.org or find our group on Facebook). Everyone should know that Lindsey Spires and I are entirely volunteers in this effort. Lindsey and I, in addition to our commitment to this project, put in countless hours for COR, on average 5-10 a week. To address the concern about native versus non-native (Mr. Ease): I would argue I am the ideal candidate to raise my voice and hand for this project and its spin-offs. A third generation Columbian and USC alumna, I moved to Atlanta the day after I graduated due to the proverbial "lack of opportunity." Seven years later I still referred to Columbia as "home" and now I'm more than happy to tell anyone why I'm a Boomeranger (read/learn more about Boomerangers in our survey results at http://www.columbiatalent.com). Jeffrey, I'm sad that you do not remember meeting me several times at various events! I'm an alumna of Columbia Dance Theatre and the USC Dance Company, in addition to being an avid supporter of the arts community. What I most remember about you is your sock collection! (smile) You may not see Greg Hilton at 701 Whaley, but you will see him at any and all of the multitudes of awesome outdoor recreation opportunities in the area. Our other team members lead and volunteer and serve more organizations than I can count. They are the heart and spirit of the Creative Class. My point is - our team is out there. We look forward to meeting you (again). Katherine Swartz, CAE 2008-2009 Board Chair Columbia Opportunity Resource
Katherine SwartzAugust 3rd 03:24pm
Hi. Greg Hilton here. The huge volume of comments to this article tells me one thing...we have hit a nerve. That gets me excited b/c it means we have passionate people that are tired of the status quo and see a vision for something different in our community. You all may not have known me, but I'm here and involved because I want to be. I'm a transplant from Ohio/North Carolina and came down here seven years ago to get my Graduate degree. I could have gone anywhere (as any of you could), but chose to stay because I felt like whether personally or professionally, I can actually make a difference here. That is what matters to me…being part of something bigger than yourself. Dan chose to put me on the cover and our team in the article, but it could just as well have been any one of the thousands of people that in their own way are actively making this a better community… Trust me...there is a ton (A TON) wrong with Columbia and I often times have to breathe deeply (inhale…exhale) to prevent myself from getting too worked up. However, at the end of the day, complaining is the absolute easiest thing to do. It requires talking, typing, and perhaps some independent thought (depending on the individual). I could go on and on about the lack of public transportation, bad decisions that have been made by some leaders, the lack of green space, no bike lanes, a lack of cool outdoor cafes/eateries, no sustainable plan for growth, pervasive crime, a lack of community pride, or the completely fragmented way so many organizations in our region operate....BUT, WE ALREADY KNOW THAT! SO, WHAT ARE WE GOING TO DO ABOUT IT AND WHAT ARE YOU GOING TO DO ABOUT IT? At the end of the day, you wake up in Columbia, you live/work in Columbia, and you go to sleep in Columbia…so, it is actually up to you…funny how that works. To the comments regarding "getting paid to do this", yes, EngenuitySC is one of the professional organizations that has dedicated people and resources to addressing and solving this problem. Would you rather our community not invest in this, would you rather we go deal with an easier and less important task? We could just let your comments go unanswered, let these issues fester, and accept that everything is "GREAT". That is not the case. So, you have to ask yourself, as a volunteer or as a part of your job…”what fires me up the most and what can I do about it”. Regardless of how much money our city/region throws at this issue, if we cannot come together to change the way things work here, we're toast...pack it up. And while, yes, we are tasked with taking on these types of issues in my organization, this is one of many projects that we are focused on. And its offshoots are also but a few of the many projects for which I volunteer my time...every week. Whether it is a YPO, Harvest Hope, teaching ESL, street cleanups, rocking out the music scene, or supporting the arts...t is a matter of doing, not talking. There are people, who I am proud to call partners and colleagues who put in ridiculous hours after work just to make change happen. Are you one of them? So, here’s our challenge to you. For every negative thing that was said, thanks for your feedback and for sharing many opinions that we too believe. Now...stop talking and start doing…we need you and Columbia needs you…cause it ain’t going to happen by itself…that much we know. If you don't know HOW to get involved, ask anybody in the article, send us an email at info@columbiatalent.com, check out the Free Times for more, or just ask any of the hundreds of people working everyday to make it a better place through volunteerism, the arts, entertainment, or economic development. Change is not easy, and big change requires big thought...thanks for your big thoughts. Cheers, Greg Hilton
Greg HiltonAugust 3rd 06:13pm
Have your say
*
*
*
Your comment will be displayed after it has been reviewed by our editors. Please refer to our comments policy if you have any questions, or email editor@free-times.com.
Comments (22)

FREE TIMES site search by Free Times - Columbia's Free Alternative Weekly
www.mintjuleprestaurant.com
www.free-times.com/index.php?cat=1211804063929847&ShowArticle_ID
hardknoxgrill.com
www.riverbanks.org
www.hamptonplacecafe.com
www.mylittlelambsandivy.com
www.homeshopcwp.info
www.free-times.com/index.php?cat=1991310090771539
Circulation VerifiedCopyright © 2009, Portico Publications
Copyright Info | Portico Corporate
Powered by PLANet w3 CMS Content Management System
PLANet Systems Group 2009