Issue #22.34 :: 08/26/2009 - 09/01/2009
Devine Proposes Prayer, Council Says Amen

Council Members Say Church-State Separation Will Be Respected

BY ERIC K. WARD

Acting on a proposal by Columbia City Councilwoman and possible mayoral candidate Tameika Isaac Devine, City Council unanimously and with no discussion has approved a potentially divisive policy to begin its meetings with a prayer.

All of the council’s seven members except Kirkman Finlay voted to adopt the policy Aug. 19. Finlay was absent.
 

 
At-large City Councilwoman Tameika Isaac Devine says she is considering running for mayor of Columbia.
Photo by Jonathan Sharpe

The six members voted without saying one word about the issue, despite the deeply personal tenets of religion, a tendency for church-state issues to be polarizing and the fact that a smorgasbord of faiths, as well as agnostics and atheists, call the Capital City home.

“I’m always suspicious when public officials want to include a prayer in what they’re doing, because it strikes me as pandering to religious voters,” says the Rev. Neal Jones, minister of the Unitarian Universalist Fellowship of Columbia and president of the local chapter of Americans United for Separation of Church and State.

Jones says City Council’s prayer practice is bad for religion, because it gets government involved in it, and bad for public policy, because it invariably leads to a government entity favoring the dominant faith, in this case Christianity.

The policy could open the city to a lawsuit challenging whether it is constitutional, a common occurrence in the modern struggle to define what if any role is proper for religion in government affairs.

To pass constitutional muster, such prayers must be universal, says Victoria Middleton, director of the American Civil Liberties Union’s South Carolina office.

Devine, one of three at-large representatives on the council, was first elected to her seat in 2002, defeating longtime incumbent Frannie Heizer. In so doing, Devine won accolades as a youthful, fresh-faced and first testament to the fact that Columbia has progressed to a point that voters would favor an African-American in a citywide election.

Now nearing the end of her second term, Devine faces a crossroads in city elections slated for April: Will she seek re-election as a councilwoman, or, as she has publicly pondered, try to ascend to the mayor’s office?

“I am considering it,” she says of the latter, “and right now what I think I’m weighing is whether or not the timing is right for me to do that.” Devine says her contemplation centers on how she would balance the time she devotes to her family and her business and the demands that serving as mayor would place on her schedule. The councilwoman and her husband, Jamie, have a 4-year-old daughter and she is a partner in the Jabber & Isaac law firm.

Devine says she was surprised that City Council had not been starting its meetings with an invocation. “And I totally respect the whole separation of church and state,” she says.
But Devine says council members have an important job to do — the will of the people.

“And I think starting with an invocation gives you that importance and sets that tone,” she says. “But it’s definitely our desire to give voice to a diverse group.”

Asked to comment on voting for the policy, Mayor Bob Coble and Councilmen Sam Davis and Daniel Rickenmann said they are not worried about implicitly endorsing a particular religion.

Messages left for Council members Belinda Gergel and E.W. Cromartie were not returned.


Let us know what you think: Email news@free-times.com.

 
Comments
Well the City has done it again - do you WANT lawsuits? Did you ever read about the same issue in Great Falls? Having a CHRISTIAN prayer before each meeting will not improve the decisions you make. It is not inclusive and progressive and it, again, makes Columbia look like a backward civilization and to be honest I don't have any retort.
PatriciaAugust 26th 01:15pm
So, the City has decided to set a tone of religiosity before every meeting. Good luck to any atheist that may have to present an issue before them.
CurtAugust 26th 02:44pm
I DONNOT SEE ANY HARM SAYING A PRAY AT ANY MEETINGS AT ALL.ALL YOU HAVE TO SAY IS PRY IN YOUR OWN WAY.I TRIED ALL THESE LIBERAL COMMIE PEOPLE SAY WE CANNOT PRY
cletus j stock jrAugust 26th 02:59pm
Growing up Jewish in SC, I was made to feel awkward, different and alone when I was forced to listen to prayers in school, before events, and later in life, before meetings, at award functions, etc. Was not our country founded, in part, on religious freedom and separation of church and state? A person's religion and religious practices such as prayer, should be private and respected. Why must people feel the need to thrust their own personal religious thoughts and prayers on others? This is disrespectful of others.
Ellen WoodoffAugust 27th 10:55am
According to the Bible, Jesus thought public prayers are meant for show and to impress people with your piety (Matt. 6:1-6). He advised his followers not to be like such hypocrites (Jesus' word), but instead to prayer in private. I wish Christians (or people who call themselves Christian) would follow the teachings of Jesus. I guess the pull of pandering to religious voters is just too strong for many of our politicians to resist.
NJAugust 27th 01:41pm
Thank you, Cletus, for proving the point of all us "liberal commies." P.S. Turn your caps lock off.
Allison StrangeAugust 27th 03:00pm
Interesting, but not surprising. You cannot really go anywhere without someone bursting out in prayer. I like how Cletus says 'pry' instead of prayer - because my question or concern is this: as a nontheist, I have no issue with those who believe in some religion, but if I go in front of council and I do not engage in a prayer, will I be treated equally?
DavidAugust 31st 01:30am
I see that Ms. Divine is African-American. She must be of the mistaken opinion that she has overcome the divisive racism that continues to plague this Nation; now she can join the "majority" (read that "Christian") and participate in the open discrimination against others. The City Council is nauseating, at best. Another fine example of the Southeast entering the 19th Century. Welcome.
DonAugust 31st 04:15pm
The City Council is backstabbing those who believe that government should be for all the people. By establishing this edict, it is basically excluding people who do not believe what the City Council believes. Prayer should be said in separate chambers or in a church. City Council chambers is not the venue for prayers.
DannyAugust 31st 05:02pm
I am constantly amazed that individuals who have law degrees, do not have the grounding in our Constitution, where separation of Church and State is prescribed. Our third President, Thomas Jefferson referred to the "wall of separation" and our second President, John Adams, recognised that the United States was definitely not a "Christian Nation". Let`s make everyone welcome at public functions by not imposing any religious "test" that might be offensive to them.
Manfred KoehlerAugust 31st 05:08pm
In their sincere desire to be inclusive I'm sure the Council will not mind having a different prayer (or equivalent) every meeting: Christian, Jewish, Muslim, Jainist, Buddhist, Hindu, Sikh, Wiccan, Vodun, Scientologist, etc, and a meeting with no prayer for the atheist/agnostic set. There must be at least one person of each of these religions in the city limits, no?
SangerAugust 31st 08:34pm
It looks like Ms. Devine has learned to play the pandering game well. I say it's time to start taxing churches when religion exerts so much influence upon our so-called "elected representatives" that they feel they have to pay homage to the power of holy hooey in this way. Religion is a business just like any other business. Why should churches get a tax-free ride when they seem so interested in influencing the outcome of elections?
Blue-eyed VideotSeptember 1st 12:03am
I hope they pray for some competence which has been in short supply within the city council.
BillSeptember 2nd 09:23am
Politicians are like prostitutes. They will say or do whatever it takes to be paid (elected). Once they've found something that reliably gets them paid, they will continue to offer it. Religous pandering works, and as long as it does, they are happy to wipe themselves with the Constitution. I'm tired of lawsuits, because politicians are happy to spend taxpayer money on lawsuits they know they'll lose, as long as they get re-elected. The only way to get them to pay more than lip-service to the Constiution is to pay them to do it. Vote them out if they don't.
DeanSeptember 5th 12:42pm
First, this is not a Constitutional issue. The First Amendment talks about Congress making laws, not about representatives praying. Second, using the phrase "separation of church and state" to argue against this is misusing Jefferson's words. He himself used the phrase "freedom of religion" MUCH more often to discuss the need for the First Amendment. The same people who wrote the First Amendment and ratified it also opened their first meeting as The U.S. Congress with a 3-hour prayer. I am making the assumption that the people praying before meetings are not praying for conversion of non-believers, but rather are praying for wise action on their own parts. If the praying person is even 10% faithful, perhaps their prayer for guidance will influence them to be more thoughtful. If they are Jewish, Christian, or Muslim, they could ask their god to help them be wise. Don't we want that?
History MattersSeptember 26th 06:32pm
Have your say
*
*
*
Your comment will be displayed after it has been reviewed by our editors. Please refer to our comments policy if you have any questions, or email editor@free-times.com.
FREE TIMES site search by Free Times - Columbia's Free Alternative Weekly
archives.free-times.com/webads/Hooligans.html
www.nfcmoney.com
hardknoxgrill.com
www.riverbanks.org
www.hamptonplacecafe.com
www.myspace.com/onelovemuzach
www.wrayvw.com
www.free-times.com/index.php?cat=1991310090771539
Circulation VerifiedCopyright © 2009, Portico Publications
Copyright Info | Portico Corporate
Powered by PLANet w3 CMS Content Management System
PLANet Systems Group 2009