CONTACT | WRITE TO THE EDITOR | WORK AT FREE-TIMES
Issue #22.46 :: 11/18/2009 - 11/24/2009
Censure of Graham Goes Beyond Usual Griping

Conservative Base Incensed Over Support for Cap and Trade

BY AL DOZIER

U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham often receives verbal slaps from the more conservative voices in South Carolina’s GOP, but a recent censure by the Charleston County Republican Party’s executive committee is more like a slap in the face.
 

 
Sen. Lindsey Graham
File photo

The Nov. 9 censure resolution doesn’t mince words.

“U.S. Sen. Lindsey Graham in the name of bipartisanship continues to weaken the Republican brand and tarnish the ideals of freedom, rule of law and fiscal conservatism,” the resolution states.

Charleston’s GOP chair, Lin Bennett, says there are a lot of problems with Graham’s positions, but his support of the “cap and trade” approach to limiting carbon emissions is “the straw that broke the camel’s back.”

The resolution references Graham’s cooperation with U.S. Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., on a bipartisan energy bill.

Asked to respond, Graham spokesman Kevin Bishop says anyone concerned about the senator’s conservatism should look at his record. Graham has maintained a “conservative” voting record of 85 percent and is rated the 15th most conservative senator by the National Journal

“Like former President Reagan, he strongly believes elected officials need to find common ground and work together to solve difficult problems like making our nation energy independent and protecting our environment,” Bishop says.

The censure has raised eyebrows, but it might be too early to predict a political burial for the Seneca native, who has held his seat since 2002.

“He has always come to loggerheads with the purists in his own party, which is why he gets so many independent — and even some Democratic — votes,” says Scott Huffmon, a political science professor at Winthrop University.

But to subscribe to “the sky is falling” scenario, Huffman says, you’d have to forget that he has a gigantic war chest.

Huffmon notes that Graham’s primary margin of victory has always been smaller than in the general election, but also concedes that a censure goes beyond “business as usual” for Graham.

U.S. Rep. Joe Wilson, whose profile among Republicans is higher than ever, remains a staunch supporter of Graham.

“Lindsey Graham has been a great leader for our state and party,” Wilson says in a statement. “Ronald Reagan always said that people who agree with you 80 percent of the time should be considered a good friend. Reagan was a wise man and if we want to build a strong, vibrant Republican Party we should follow his advice.”

State Republican Party Chairwoman Karen Floyd’s office did not respond to requests for comment.

But Katon Dawson, the former state GOP chairman, supported Graham.

“At the end of the day, what we are looking for is offshore drilling for natural gas and Lindsey got that in the bill,” Dawson told the Huffington Post, a political web site.

The censure comes in the wake of an advertising campaign launched by the American Energy Alliance attacking Graham for his support of that bill.

Graham is fighting back with his own televised ad campaign featuring a prominent Midlands lawmaker, S.C. Sen. John Courson.

In the ad, Courson dismisses the attack as an effort by “big oil” to defeat an important energy bill.

Voters have plenty of time to mull over the issues. Graham is not up for reelection until 2014.

 
Comments
As Dawson mentioned, Senator Graham got exactly what Republicans have been asking for onto the table: provisions natural gas, offshore drilling, and nuclear power. He did it by negotiating and working together with members of the other party, instead of stubbornly refusing to talk - isn't that how a Democracy is supposed to work? Traditional job growth in South Carolina stagnated at 2% between '97 and '07, while clean energy job growth boomed at 36% ... a bill that directs further investment towards a sector that has proven growth potential seems like a great play to me. Senator Graham is advocating for the interests of SC instead of catering to party power politics -- keep up the good work sir.
kcherylNovember 18th, 2009 12:44pm
Lil' Joe Wilson was paid off by Lil' Lindsey who funneled a lot of campaign cash from his huge corporate funded war chest into Joe's more modest account. Lindsey got exactly what he deserved. He and the other neo-con-artists in the Republican party have been attacking the conservatives with principles for years and have been dragging the party down to a minority status in Congress and lost the White House. Their "big tent" has been showing real conservatives the door while letting in liberals. Just one more way, besides $305 million in earmarks to pay off Dems in the state, that Gaham can make the two parties merge. Now that real conservatives are set to take back Congress, Lindsey and Johnny are sweethearts prancing around the country funneling cash to fellow neo-cons to run in primaries against conservatives. They're using the conservative backlash that is in a huge part aimed at neo-cons like them to attempt to bring in MORE neo-cons to Congress and state offices. Typical behavior for spineless little men. They are "clever" but we've got five years to show people what Graham is: a narcissistic, self aggrandizing political monster. Graham, meanwhile, has five years to continue to dig his political grave with his big mouth and ad hominem denigrations of his constituency.
WorkingTommyCNovember 18th, 2009 09:23pm
Lindsey Graham knows how to talk with adversaries as well as supporters. That ability and willingness seems to infuriate many -- and to win the gratitude of others. I'm one of the others. Graham has been the subject of disagreements between me and my brother for years now, and neither of us has the slightest intention of giving in. Here's my side: I wonder how many of us remember how Graham took his own good time when considering the arguments pro and con impeachment proceedings against Bill Clinton. At the right moment, in view of the whole nation, he came out strongly in favor of impeachment. His announcement made a big impression on everyone paying attention, especially on the Democrats who just KNEW he was on their side. He drew their immediate and very loud anger. To this day even the nation as a whole seems vague on the fact that lying under oath to a federal investigation is NOT protected by a President's privileged position. Lindsey Graham realized it very clearly. He does that; he thinks clearly, and he has little patience with those who live a lie. The anger of the powerful and the loud didn't faze Graham in the least; he said what he thought, and said it well. That was the first time I realized just how fortunate we are in South Carolina to be represented by this clear thinker and speaker. No WONDER Joe Wilson, who dares to call a liar and liar, supports Lindsey Graham. The courage of his convictions seems a way of life for Lindsey Graham. As for "Cap and Trade," well, if we were allowed to develop our own sources of energy as he is negotiating for us to be allowed to do, such a regressive, anti-business law would have no teeth -- no way to hurt industry because it could quickly switch to natural gas or other domestic fuel as we developed fuel purifying systems. (There are many available now, which are being ignored by this administration. Why? Too long to explain here.) Why are we being kept from drilling and producing and developing our own? WHY? Must we eventually spend every penny that we as individuals earn to sustain the comfort of our families at home, travel to work, feed our children, and live? I hope Cap and Trade never becomes law, and I'm confident Graham hopes so too. He's a conservative -- among the most consistent conservatives in the Senate -- and conservatives never believe in interference against the good of the people. We don't believe the way to perfection lies through the passing of laws. I think our Senator's just too smart to stop negotiating for the best he can get for the people he represents. He now has the ear of some who seem to be in Obama's pocket -- a pocket filled now with MY and YOUR tax money that the Administration's giving away to foreign producers of oil largely backed and owned by George Soros and other fabulously wealthy Democrats now on the take. If Graham can get other Democrats to agree to let the US find ways to get out from under the control of foreign producers of oil and of American residents who would love to take this nation down, why then LET Lindsey Graham try. He's trying for US, please remember. We sent that huge Democrat majority to Congress; we let them take it over. Now Lindsey Graham has to live with what a misled nation did. I believe in a two-party system, but we have almost let that system slip away. The latest reason for being proud of Lindsey Graham? His understanding or the military, and his unfailing support for it and those who serve. He has just today made the best possible argument against Obama's decision to bring terrorists into our nation and try them civilly rather than militarily, as though their organization of hatred had not declared war against us and done their best to bring us down. Today Graham quoted the law to the President and the administration, all of whom seem to have only the slipperiest, foggiest grasp of it. Graham knows the law. He knows civil and criminal law (remember the impeachment!) as well as military law, and if we don't listen to him now -- if instead we allow ourselves to be fooled into thinking that slick words from slick talkers can take the place of law and order -- well, we don't deserve Lindsey Graham. But I think we do deserve him. Because we elected him, we deserve this upright, smart, and incredibly well informed man. Lindsey Graham deserves our support. Shame on the Charleston Republican Party for acting otherwise, and for forgetting Reagan's very wise rule: Never speak ill of a fellow Republican.
Beverly SpearsNovember 19th, 2009 12:21am
I have always been a supporter of Sen Lindsey Graham. On certain issues like "illegal immigration" and "cap and trade" he has been way off. I appreciate his advocacy for natural gas and off-shore drilling, but it still doesn't take away the overall negative impact that "cap and trade" will have on our economy and our wallet!
BrianNovember 23rd, 2009 11:06am
Have your say
*
*
*
Your comment will be displayed after it has been reviewed by our editors. Please refer to our comments policy if you have any questions, or email editor@free-times.com.
FREE TIMES site search by Free Times - Columbia's Free Alternative Weekly
www.nfcmoney.com
hardknoxgrill.com
www.riverbanks.org
www.hamptonplacecafe.com
www.surveymonkey.com/s/RCYLSQZ
www.palmettoluna.org/
www.free-times.com/index.php?cat=1991310090771539
Circulation VerifiedCopyright © 2010, Portico Publications
Copyright Info | Portico Corporate
Powered by PLANet w3 CMS Content Management System
PLANet Systems Group 2010