HOME | CONTACT | WRITE TO THE EDITOR | WORK AT FREE-TIMES
www.snapclasses.com
 Quote

"When the leadership in this state thinks about tax relief it’s about tax relief for corporations. It’s not usually tax relief for working people." -- Gilda Cobb-Hunter, Orangeburg social worker and Democratic Rep.

The Side Line
www.freetimeshelpwanted.com
www.free-times.com/index.php?cat=1992107093843365
Follow us on Twitter
Hablamos Espanol!
Side Line Blog
by Side Line
by Ron Aiken, May 1st 05:54pm

Even with today's loss to Alabama evening the weekend series at one apiece heading into Sunday, it bears noting that this season's accomplishments to-date (33-9, 15-5) absolutely are on par with coach Ray Tanner's three consecutive College World Series teams from 2002-2004. This season's Gamecocks also are compare favorably with Tanner's best club in his USC tenure, the 2000 team that bulldozed the SEC with an amazing 25-5 conference record before losing in the NCAA Super Regional to Louisiana-Lafayette.

That's why I think this year's team represents the best chance Tanner has had in some time to host not only an NCAA Regional but also securing a key Super Regional for Carolina Stadium, a stadium where, by the way, the Gamecocks this season are 21-3.

What also boggles the mind -- and which irritates me to no end when national pollsters fail to acknowledge it -- is that this team started off 6-4. To have gone 27-5 since then and to have won a record nine consecutive SEC series dating to last year (six straight in 2010) is an achievement I still don't think has sunk in for the smarmy experts at Baseball America or the dingbat college coaches (or, more likely, their assistants) who also vote.

And, by the way, USC was first overall heading into Saturday's play, despite being ranked behind other league teams consistently in various polls. So there. I'll leave you with this by way of comparison with previous teams, and I have to credit my buddy David Cloninger at GamecockCentral.com for scrounging these numbers together. All three of Tanner's CWS teams sparkled down the stretch, losing no steam and playing superb baseball with rhythmic consistency in all areas of the game. Here's USC's second-half SEC record since 2000:

 

2010: 4-1
2009: 10-5 (17-13)
2008: 6-9 (15-15)
2007: 8-7 (17-13)
2006: 4-11 (15-15)
2005: 7-8 (16-14)
2004: 10-5 (17-13)
2003: 12-4 (19-11)
2002: 12-3 (21-8)
2001: 9-6 (17-13)
2000: 13-2 (25-5)

 

One last thing I'd like to note: Since 2000, Tanner has not once had a losing SEC record, nor will he this season. That 10-year stretch may be one of the most remarkable in recent SEC history, and it stands as a tribute to a coach that is constantly overshadowed by one after another big-name football flop and a basketball program that has been to the NCAA Tournament only once -- once! -- in the past 13 years.

Comments
USC is currently 14th in the Boyd's World pseudo-RPI and 16th in the Boyd's World iterative strength ratings. How much weight does the RPI carry in determining national seeds?
Jim May 4th 04:11pm
Jim,
The RPI is a significant factor considered by pollsters, the biggest reason being with so many teams you can't see nearly what you need to see in terms of other teams' play across the country and yet you also need to be able to go on more than just an overall record.

The problem is that it becomes more of a factor than it merits and does not take into account the value of series wins, winning or losing streaks, the value of individual players and the perspective/history of teams, reflecting only the current season to-date and ignoring the previous season and beyond's impact on the current season. Also, no credit is given to coaching ability.

So, at best it's only a rough sketch of this season's scheduling and the performance of this season's foes this year. No more, no less.

That's not to argue for RPI's irrelevance as a factor at all, only a warning to give it the weight it deserves next to the far more important indicators of conference and division performance.
Ron Aiken May 11th 07:30pm
Have your say
*
*
*
Your comment will be displayed after it has been reviewed by the blog author. Please refer to our comments policy if you have any questions, or email editor@free-times.com.
www.mungo.com/
www.riverbanks.org/
www.cplite.com
hardknoxgrill.com
Gamecocks versus Georgia: What's Your Prediction?

Both the Gamecocks and the Bulldogs enjoyed lopsided victories in their first games this season. But now the SEC rivals face each other, and most observers are predicting a close game. What's your prediction?

 I'm a bot, don't pay attention to my vote
 Gamecocks win by more than 10
 Gamecocks win by less than 10
 Bulldogs win by more than 10
 Bulldogs win by less than 10

Add a Comment?
First Name (optional)

Survey Comment (optional)
 /results/archive/
click on the day to see the events for that day
 Prev   Sep 2010  Next  
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30  
 
event: pick your type
 
music: pick your venue
 
dining: pick your cuisine
 
www.free-times.com/index.php?cat=1991310090771539
Circulation VerifiedCopyright © 2010, Portico Publications
Copyright Info | Portico Corporate
Powered by PLANet w3 CMS Content Management System
PLANet Systems Group 2010