www.garnetandblacktraditions.com/jewelwrhse/default.asp?s_id=1&&
 Quote

"I haven’t heard from [concert promoters 2010 Entertainment] since August. I don’t know what happened to them." -- Prince Ice, on the Legends of Hip-Hop show that was slated for Friday

www.hamptonplacecafe.com
www.free-times.com/index.php?cat=1992107093843365
Hablamos Espanol!
Smoking Cessation Program
Side Line Blog
by Ron Aiken
by Ron Aiken, November 8th 05:39pm

How about that offense eh? Facing the league’s worst defense in Arkansas, USC scored once on a big play, once on a short-field after a questionable fake punt call and generally did little else the whole game but bumble about.

The result is that now the Gamecocks are 98th in the nation in scoring offense, managing 21.3 points a contest through 10 games. In SEC play, through seven games the Gamecocks are averaging 18.5 points per contest. It’s even worse in the past month. With only one of the previous four opponents having a winning record overall or in conference (Alabama), USC’s total has plummeted to just 12.3 points a game.

And while much is made about the Gamecocks being No. 2 in the SEC in passing offense, in terms of passing touchdowns, USC ranks seventh in the league. And remember how, back at the beginning of the year, much ado also was made about USC’s new commitment to the run? If you believed that, then you’re a sucker, because the Gamecocks are 91st in the country rushing the ball — and dead last, again, in the SEC at 3.8 yards per carry and 121.6 yards per game.

Among the other areas USC is at the bottom of the conference: turnovers gained (No. 11 out of 12); kickoff returns (No. 11); passes intercepted (tied for last with Georgia); scoring offense (No. 11); turnover margin (No. 9); and sacks allowed (No. 100 in the country, No. 11 in the SEC). 

With the exception of passing offense and passing defense (both No. 2total defense) and total defense (No. 4), for the rest of the conference categories, USC is solidly in the bottom half of the SEC, taking the No. 8 spot in total offense, rushing defense, pass efficiency defense, net punting, punt returns and passing efficiency.

But you and I don’t need an excel spreadsheet to see that the product on the field is predictably regressing as it does every year. With three people essentially having input over play-calling (Spurrier Jr. first and foremost, with Spurrier and offensive line coach Eric Woolford chiming in), the team has no identity other than get down early most games and throw the hell out of the ball trying to get back in the game.

That might work with a better quarterback than Stephen Garcia. But it doesn’t with the offense as it is comprised now, because while cutting down in his turnovers, Garcia has shown a wildly inaccurate arm. For two or three throws he looks superb, then he’ll just as quickly take three steps backward and do something stupid (interception, fumble, missed snap, taking a sack, etc.).

Facing off against the nation’s No. 1 team on Saturday and facing a team two weeks later in Clemson that might just win the ACC, now is not the time to bungle on offense, but once again, that’s exactly what Spurrier and Spurrier Jr. are accomplishing. If that’s good enough for you this far into the season and his tenure, then so be it. For me — and a lot more people who try to watch this team every week — it isn’t, and if USC fails to win another game, hard questions need to be put to the man who likes to call himself the HBC.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Filed under: Spurrier, Stephen Garcia, USC
Comments
What we learned was after 5 years of Coach Spurrier the team is no better. South Carolina is being beat by teams with head coaches that been there less longer than Spurrier. Spurrier had 5 years to recruit and build this team. These are his players. No one else. Spurrier needs to go at the end of the season. I am tired of this crap of South Carolina plays in the toughest league in the nation. I am tired of the coaches and fans that say "our stats" looked great for this game or that game. Take the stats an shove them. There is only one stat that matters. NUMBER OF WINS!!!!!
BlackMagic84 November 9th 12:26pm
Well, if they can't do it with Spurrier, they can't do it...doh.

Seriously, Ron. I need jokes here! Levity, my friend, levity! If you can't beat them, mock them.
Anne November 10th 04:08pm
I agree with Blackmagic94, 5 years is enough to see more improvement. Another 6-6 season sucks. We should go after Boise States coach, in 11 seasons he is 117-20, pretty darn good. Let Spurrier run his contract out thru 2011 and if he isn't blowing out everybody let's start over and go with some young up and coming talent.
Classof1978 November 11th 07:04pm
Isn't Spurrier pretty far down the pay scale among SEC head football coaches? I doubt that USC is going to pay what it takes to build a top-notch coach.
Jim November 12th 04:17pm
IF Spurrier stays thru 2011 he is due a $1 million dollar payout. Playing in the SEC is no longer an excuse for failure! Better recruiting has not yet equalled better results. The defense has played about as well as it can given all the injuries and suspensions. No offensive injuries to speak of.
Steve Jr November 12th 05:26pm
Our offense is good. We move the ball - over 300 yards per game. And playing in the SEC is a reasonable excuse. We played the 1 and 2 and previously 4 team in the country. Tenn and Arkansas's records aren't an indication of the talent they have underneath the hood. The stats in the list you provided that do matter are: turnover margin, special teams and sacks. We have a crappy offensive line that is getting better. We made adjustments in the TN game that helped - we started keeping backs in the backfield to guard. I expect solid recruits this area. We have sloppy ball handling. TN saw it and took advantage of it in the rain. Most of our receivers are young and are adapting to this level of play. Garcia was pretty bad at the beginning of the year. He has gotten a lot better. He is moving the ball. Special teams is just practice, we have the talent. I think Spurrier has failed here. Regardless of what happens after the Clemson game, I am happy with what I see on the field now. They just have to stop bending over and taking up the rear when they aren't in the lead. They don't play to win like other teams (Clemson).
Justin November 16th 12:09am
Have your say
*
*
*
Your comment will be displayed after it has been reviewed by the blog author. Please refer to our comments policy if you have any questions, or email editor@free-times.com.
www.mungo.com/
www.mintjuleprestaurant.com
www.free-times.com/index.php?cat=1211804063929847&ShowArticle_ID
hardknoxgrill.com
www.riverbanks.org
Gamecocks versus Clemson

The Gamecocks did surprisingly well against Florida, losing to the No. 1-ranked team by just 10 points compared to last year's 50-point blowout. Does this bode well for the Gamecocks' Nov. 28 showdown against Clemson?

 I'm a bot, don't pay attention to my vote.
 Yes, Gamecocks can beat Clemson!
 No, Gamecocks are finished this year.
 Don't know -- should be close.
 Other reaction (please specify)

Add a Comment?
First Name (optional)

Survey Comment (optional)
 /results/archive/
click on the day to see the events for that day
 Prev   Nov 2009  Next  
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
 
1 2 3 4 5 6 7
8 9 10 11 12 13 14
15 16 17 18 19 20 21
22 23 24 25 26 27 28
29 30  
 
event: pick your type
 
music: pick your venue
 
dining: pick your cuisine
 
www.sandsartsupply.com
www.free-times.com/index.php?cat=1211804063929847&ShowArticle_ID
www.free-times.com/index.php?cat=1991310090771539
Circulation VerifiedCopyright © 2009, Portico Publications
Copyright Info | Portico Corporate
Powered by PLANet w3 CMS Content Management System
PLANet Systems Group 2009