HOME | CONTACT | WRITE TO THE EDITOR | WORK AT FREE-TIMES
www.snapclasses.com
 Quote

"[Michael] Wukela claimed he doesn’t look at his paychecks to see where the money’s coming from." -- Eva Moore, on conflicting answers to the question of who is paying the mayor's spokesman

The Side Line
www.freetimeshelpwanted.com
Take Better Pictures in a Snap!
Follow us on Twitter
Hablamos Espanol!
This Just In
by Free-Times Writers
by Dan Cook, February 9th, 2009 02:34pm

The theme of Mayor Bob Coble’s “State of the City” address this year, delivered last Thursday at the Convention Center, was “Challenges and Opportunities.” [Download a PDF of the speech.]

Whether you agree or disagree with the mayor’s take on the status of things in our fair city, Coble’s speech gives a good deal of insight into his perception of how our city is doing.

Perhaps more importantly, the speech gives citizens some benchmarks by which to measure future success — or lack thereof.

Here are some of the highlights, along with thoughts on what the mayor said:

Introductory remarks: “In Columbia, our relationship with our neighborhoods is strong. I would ask that our neighborhood leaders stand and be recognized.”

Yes, it is strong — some would say too strong. While governing is always a balancing act among competing interests, in Columbia, neighborhoods have shown a striking ability to deploy a not-in-my-backyard mentality to great effect, frequently killing proposals that aren’t to their liking but might well be in the best interests of the city as a whole.

Of course, it’s not just neighborhoods with this ability — it’s almost any well-organized, vocal group. Case in point: The landlords who just successfully killed a proposal to require $11 per year business licenses, a move that neighborhood groups supported.

Accounting breakdown: “We have been scrutinizing our city’s financial operations from top to bottom, and we have not been happy with what we have seen … Without making any excuses for embarrassing past weaknesses, we have now made solid progress in constructing a modern financial management structure for the city.”

Kudos to the mayor for addressing this issue head-on and pledging to fix it. But I have to wonder how long the city’s accounting issues might have festered if not for aggressive media coverage of the problem.

Crime: “Fighting crime will always be our top priority. Chief Tandy Carter is implementing his Comprehensive Plan for the Police Department that concentrates first on hiring, retention, and training of the officers in our Department.”

Commitment to fighting crime is key. Columbia has an absurdly high crime rate, and the combination of recession and tight budgets will make the challenge of bringing that rate down even more difficult than usual. Will City Council give Chief Carter the support he needs? And where will the money come from?

Homelessness: The mayor mentioned the city’s commitment to the Housing First Pilot Program and the Winter Shelter on Calhoun Street. Not mentioned: A proposed new shelter on Elmwood Street that has drawn controversy from surrounding neighborhoods for its proposed location.

Education: Coble touted the city’s Together We Can program, a collaborative effort with Richland School District One. City involvement in improving downtown schools is welcome and long overdue; let’s see how this plays out.

There’s plenty more in the speech on any number of subjects. You might find it enlightening to read Coble’s speech and ask yourself if his perception of Columbia’s challenges and opportunities matches yours. After all, the mayor is asking us for a sixth four-year term in 2010. The least we can all do is give serious thought to whether he deserves our support.
 

Comments
I loathe the extent to which "neighborhoods have shown a striking ability to deploy a not-in-my-backyard mentality". In light of the focus on bipartisan cooperation in our national and local governments, have the residents of these neighborhoods learned nothing? I'm no religious fanatic but I do believe the bible indicates that the poor and the hungry will always be with us. This means, they will never go away. As for the poor and homeless and hungry...these people are an opportunity for us, in neighborhoods everywhere, to show compassion and love and tolerance and to identify with them as fellow human beings. Wake up!
Evelyn Morales February 9th, 2009 03:11pm
I think the mayor was "right on" with his comments about the strong relationship between the city and the neighborhoods. and I think Dan Cook's oblique suggestion that said strength should, perhaps, be abated in favor of the "interests of the city as a whole" are a bit off the mark. Always opting for the good of the many instead of individual parts of the whole is not good logic and does not always characterize good governance. Generally speaking, I have found that the people who develop love and loyalty for their neighborhoods also hold those same feelings for their city. They often represent the real strength of the city.
Eduardo Arbusto February 9th, 2009 03:15pm
If this past year has shown us anything, it's that Columbia is ready for new leadership. The public is no longer willing to accept cronyism, mediocre performance, small town mentalities and outright incompetence. We are ready to move forward, and new candidates are stepping up to the plate. If we don't support them, progress in Columbia will be set back instead of springing forward.
Kate February 12th, 2009 10:12pm
1. It's not a new shelter on Elmwood; they just want to make improvements on the one that is already there.
2. F**k Leon Lott
Michael Anastasion February 12th, 2009 10:55pm
It's a $15 million expansion involving new construction on a new site and a significantly expanded mission. So, yes, they are planning improvements to what the Salvation Army offers on Elmwood, but it's not a stretch to say that it's a new facility, either.
Dan February 12th, 2009 11:10pm
Eduardo, I agree that the city should have strong ties to neighborhoods. But there is a danger in going overboard and deferring to neighborhood presidents on the assumption that they, in fact, represent the views of most of the people in their area when that might or might not be the case.

Like any interest group, neighborhood groups tend to be a small and vocal minority; just because a group is making a lot of noise doesn't mean it is right and should be deferred to.

This isn't just an issue with neighborhoods, either, this is an issue with City Council in general -- that it sometimes lacks the backbone to stand up to a vocal minority (neighborhood or otherwise) and overrule it.
Dan February 12th, 2009 11:38pm
Have your say
*
*
*
Your comment will be displayed after it has been reviewed by the blog author. Please refer to our comments policy if you have any questions, or email editor@free-times.com.
www.mungo.com/
www.riverbanks.org/
www.cplite.com
hardknoxgrill.com
Wilson, Miller, Mulvaney and Spratt

It sounds like the name of a nefarious law firm in a gritty crime paperback, but these are actually the name of four candidates running for Congress. In both races -- incumbent Republican Joe Wilson against Democrat Rob Miller and incumbent Democrat John Spratt against Republican Mick Mulvaney -- the national health care reform debate has been a key theme setting the context. How do you think these races will play out?

 I'm a bot ... don't pay attention to my vote.
 Both the incumbents will win.
 Wilson will win, Spratt will lose.
 Wilson will lose, Spratt will win.
 Other (please specify)

Add a Comment?
First Name (optional)

Survey Comment (optional)
 /results/archive/
click on the day to see the events for that day
 Prev   Sep 2010  Next  
Sun Mon Tue Wed Thu Fri Sat
  1 2 3 4
5 6 7 8 9 10 11
12 13 14 15 16 17 18
19 20 21 22 23 24 25
26 27 28 29 30  
 
event: pick your type
 
music: pick your venue
 
dining: pick your cuisine
 
animatedcanvas.com/
www.free-times.com/index.php?cat=1991310090771539
Circulation VerifiedCopyright © 2010, Portico Publications
Copyright Info | Portico Corporate
Powered by PLANet w3 CMS Content Management System
PLANet Systems Group 2010